There have been interesting shifts
in the location of residence for much of the United States population. Since
about the World War II, period, there has been a dramatic increase in
suburbanization, or the development of suburbia, that is areas of housing
outside of inner cities. This may be explained by the decline of rural areas
since agricultural industries have declined and people have sought more
personal and professional opportunities by leaving rural areas. The exodus of
young people from rural areas explains the phenomenon called aging in place
where rural areas have disproportionately greater populations of older people,
and because there are such few young people there, it is unlikely that babies
will be born to replace the declining population. Suburbanization can also be
explained by the decline in urban areas. Particularly in the 1950s and 1960s,
suburbanization was stimulated by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA)’s
assistance in mortgage loans, which allowed people to own homes in suburbs for
less money than renting a residence in a city. Additionally, the mass
production of automobiles and development of roadways enabled commuting and
further encouraged people to move outwards from cities in order to enjoy better
housing, schools, and amenities. This suburbanization trend has continued today
and minorities are more present in suburbs, although the suburbs are still
about 2/3 white.
I have lived in both suburban and
urban areas. When describing a city, I definitely agree that it is a map of
contrasting areas with distinct characteristics, as Introduction to Sociology states. For example, I lived in
Washington D.C. and noticed that the Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and
Southeast portions of the city were all vastly different from one another. I
also noticed that the poorer or more affluent sections were concentrated in
specific and seemingly contained areas. For example, southeast is known for its
poverty, whereas northwest is known more for its affluence and national
monuments. I think this is an interesting demonstration for the theories of the
effects of job opportunities vs. housing segregation on poverty as Wilson and
Massey/Denton debate. I think these sociologists each have valid points, but I
do think housing segregation is powerfully isolating and helps continue the
cycle of poverty by not promoting social mobility and improvement. One might
not believe this to be true, but if one witnesses how sections of poverty are
like pieces of a different world, one can understand how this might feel like a
completely different, cut-off world where the same principles of opportunity
and equality are not applied to people.
Additionally, in the suburbs, I
have noticed a greater variety of people. While Introduction to Sociology emphasizes increased minority populations
in the suburbs, I would like to argue that this is not necessarily relevant because I think the population has shifted in general. There
has been in an increase in the diversity of our population, so an increase of minorities in the suburbs might not mean that there
are less in urban areas so much as there are just more minorities living in the
United States. Also, increased minorities in the suburbs does not mean that
urban areas are less poor. I don't think living in an urban vs. suburban environment is that strong of an economic or class indicator. Living in one place over the other does not mean a person is wealthier or poorer, it just adjusts their budgets and opportunities.
Introduction
to Sociology states that scholars are debating about the importance of the
distinction between a city and a suburb, and I think that in certain areas this
distinction is hardly definable. Cities and surrounding neighborhoods seem to
mesh into one, which is why the term “metropolitan area” has become one of my
favorites to describe such a general area, and sociologists are using it
more and more too.
In summary, yes, I agree that there
is an increase in suburbanization, an increase in the diversity of the
population (though isn’t this happening in general anyway?) a decline in rural
areas, and a seemingly perpetual challenge of poverty and urban decay.
Picture of suburbia!
No comments:
Post a Comment